Compare tractors side by side
Select up to three tractors. The table uses current source-backed records and normalized specification keys so equivalent fields line up across brands.
Popular source-backed comparisons
Permanent comparison pages use the same current database records as the interactive tool.
John Deere 5090M vs Case IH Farmall 90A vs New Holland PowerStar 90
Compare current source-backed specifications for three utility tractors around the 90 horsepower class.
Source-backed comparisonJohn Deere 5100M vs Case IH Farmall 100A vs New Holland PowerStar 100
Compare current source-backed specifications for three utility tractors around the 100 horsepower class.
Source-backed comparisonJohn Deere 5120M vs Case IH Farmall 115A vs New Holland PowerStar 120
Compare current source-backed specifications for three utility tractors around the 120 horsepower class.
Source-backed comparisonCase IH Puma 155 New vs New Holland All-New T7.190
Compare current source-backed specifications for two 155 rated horsepower row-crop tractors.
Source-backed comparisonCase IH Puma 165 New vs New Holland All-New T7.210
Compare current source-backed specifications for two 165 rated horsepower row-crop tractors.
Source-backed comparisonCase IH Puma 185 New vs New Holland All-New T7.225
Compare current source-backed specifications for two 185 rated horsepower row-crop tractors.
Source-backed comparisonJohn Deere 6R 155 vs Case IH Puma 155 New vs New Holland All-New T7.190
Compare current source-backed specifications for three tractors with 155 rated horsepower.
Source-backed comparisonJohn Deere 6R 165 vs Case IH Puma 165 New vs New Holland All-New T7.210
Compare current source-backed specifications for three tractors with 165 rated horsepower.
Source-backed comparisonJohn Deere 6R 185 vs Case IH Puma 185 New vs New Holland All-New T7.225
Compare current source-backed specifications for three tractors with 185 rated horsepower.
Source-backed comparisonJohn Deere 7R 250 vs New Holland T8.320
Compare current source-backed specifications for two tractors with 250 rated horsepower.
Source-backed comparisonJohn Deere 7R 270 vs Case IH Optum 270
Compare current source-backed specifications for high-horsepower tractors with 270 and 271 rated horsepower.
Source-backed comparisonJohn Deere 7R 290 vs Case IH Magnum 295
Compare current source-backed specifications for high-horsepower tractors with 290 and 295 rated horsepower.
Source-backed comparisonJohn Deere 7R 350 vs Case IH Magnum 355
Compare current source-backed specifications for high-horsepower tractors with 350 and 355 rated horsepower.
Source-backed comparisonJohn Deere 5075EN vs Case IH Farmall 80N vs New Holland T4.80V
Compare current source-backed specifications for three narrow orchard and vineyard tractors around the 75 horsepower class.
Source-backed comparisonJohn Deere 5090EN vs Case IH Farmall 90N vs New Holland T4.90V
Compare current source-backed specifications for three narrow orchard and vineyard tractors in the 84 to 90 horsepower range.
Source-backed comparisonJohn Deere 5105EN vs Case IH Farmall 100N vs New Holland T4.100V
Compare current source-backed specifications for three narrow orchard and vineyard tractors around the 100 horsepower class.
John Deere 5075EN
10 source-backed specification rows loaded for this comparison.
View full modelCase IH Farmall 80N
8 source-backed specification rows loaded for this comparison.
View full modelNew Holland T4.80V
10 source-backed specification rows loaded for this comparison.
View full modelKey numeric differences
Largest numeric spreads among shared source-backed specifications. Higher or lower does not imply better.
- PTO horsepower: John Deere 5075EN 58 hp vs Case IH Farmall 80N / New Holland T4.80V 65 hp.
- Rated engine power: Case IH Farmall 80N 74 hp vs John Deere 5075EN 75 hp.
Engine
| Specification | John Deere 5075EN | Case IH Farmall 80N | New Holland T4.80V |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rated engine power * | 75 hpHighest numeric valueOfficial source | 74 hpLowest numeric valueOfficial source | — |
| Emissions * | Final Tier 4Official source | — | Tier 4B FinalOfficial source |
Machine Configuration
| Specification | John Deere 5075EN | Case IH Farmall 80N | New Holland T4.80V |
|---|---|---|---|
| Application * | Narrow orchard and vineyardOfficial source | — | Vineyard and narrow-row specialty workOfficial source |
| Operator station * | Cab or Open Operator StationOfficial source | Cab or Non-cabOfficial source | Open platform or Blue Cab optionsOfficial source |
| Drive configuration * | MFWDOfficial source | 2WD or MFDOfficial source | — |
PTO
| Specification | John Deere 5075EN | Case IH Farmall 80N | New Holland T4.80V |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTO horsepower * | 58 hpLowest numeric valueOfficial source | 65 hpHighest numeric valueOfficial source | 65 hpHighest numeric valueOfficial source |
Transmission
| Specification | John Deere 5075EN | Case IH Farmall 80N | New Holland T4.80V |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transmission options * | Standard: PowrReverser 12F/12R; optional PowrReverser 24F/12ROfficial source | 16 x 16 Mechanical or 32 x 16 Power ShuttleOfficial source | Modular transmission family with Powershuttle, Dual Command Hi-Lo, Power Clutch, park lock and creeper options depending on configurationOfficial source |